Everic White

Social media, audience, product management, SEO strategy & journalism

Filtering by Tag: Roughness

Dear NFL (re: Helmet-to-Helmet Hits)



There are points in history and humanity when events don't just happen, but are spoken into existence and fruition. They're called self-fulfilling prophecies, a phenomena where a prediction directly or indirectly causes itself to become true. We see it all the time in academia, when students say things like 'Man, I'm about to go fail this exam' or 'This teacher hates me'. Both of those usually result in, lo and behold, failing the exam or the teacher growing to dislike the student in question. Yet in sports, can the same thing be said? I didn't think so until this past week, NFL, where your constant queries and attention to helmet-to-helmet hits has, in my eyes caused the destructive tackles to increase tenfold.

In my decade and change of watching professional football, never have I seen more head-to-head hits than I have over the past year. I remember the day Rich Gannon of the Raiders received the concussion that would essentially end his career. I remember wondering why there was no penalty assessed. Helmet-to-helmet hits were illegal in 2002, but nothing was said. Later on, I realized that the contact was purely incidental, and that in the game, while running at game speed, there really is no way to keep from leading with the head. Football is football. And injuries are synonymous with football, whether or not we want to admit it. Ask guys like Trent Green, Troy Aikman, and other QB's whose careers were cut short because of hard hits. Though I'm sure they'd love to still be on the field, they probably wouldn't argue that the game is inherently flawed, like you are now, NFL.

NFL, trying to curb natural hitting, through whatever initiative or fine you come up with, and even making such a raucous over helmet hits is not going to help the cause. I'd be so inclined to say they'll continue. No rule, fine or speech from Commissioner Goodell isn't going to make a difference. Yes, you've got players like James Harrison who aim to make big hits, but trying to inhibit the game at its root, the hitting, is impossible. That's like trying to stop wild pitches in baseball, or hard checks in hockey or sprained ankles in basketball. There are certain parts of a sport that will never be eradicated without changing the fabric of the sport altogether.

Add to that, NFL, I see what you guys are trying to do. Over the past decade the amount of former players coming out against your medical aid for retired players has increased. Players in the 'golden era' of football (which was ironically played without helmets) are dropping like flies from the toll of the hits they've taken, either due to debilitating mental illness like depression or decreasing motor skill functioning. You'd rather try to hinder the game than help the players who built the league. That's not to say preventative measures are unimportant. It's more that trying to change the game isn't going to alter history, much less change the game in the desired way. From a fan's standpoint, I'd rather run the risk of seeing a vicious hit, than seeing players tip-toe around the field. And I'm more than sure the players don't want to have to think about something that's as natural as breathing for them. Then again, no one likes having a concussion either. I suppose the issue is multi-faceted and not for the weak of heart. But neither is football. Let that marinate...